Dmytro Kuleba and Svitlana Paveletska Address the Controversy
Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba and his fiancée, entrepreneur Svitlana Paveletska, have responded to the scandal surrounding her comments about vibrators as an alternative to heating. The remarks, which surfaced online on January 21, sparked widespread discussion. Paveletska clarified that her statement was taken out of context.
In her explanation, Paveletska stated:
'This was recorded long before the catastrophic frosts and power outages. It was about something entirely different. I wasn't asked: What do you advise Ukrainians during the freeze? No. I was asked about new products at global adult novelty exhibitions. I simply listed items. They just cut out what they cut out.' Svitlana Paveletska
Her words indicate the interview that sparked the scandal was not about current heating issues but focused on other topics.
Dmytro Kuleba also commented on the situation. He stressed that the interview was highlighted by Anatoliy Shariy, whom Kuleba described as 'a person who genuinely hates Ukraine and everything associated with it.' Kuleba noted that Russian media outlets then amplified the information, after which it spread among Ukrainian critics. This incident highlights how domestic disputes can be weaponized in the context of the ongoing information war.
'He is genuinely a person who hates Ukraine and everything associated with it, while hiding behind the fight for a proper Ukraine,' Kuleba added.
Kuleba also emphasized the importance of unity during difficult times, remarking:
'I believe such things must be endured together. Any similar crises. Because if the two of you cannot get through a severe crisis, it means you are not made for each other.' Dmytro Kuleba
He urged understanding that internal conflicts can harm the country in the face of external threats.
The comments from Kuleba and Paveletska represent an attempt to clarify the situation and prevent the further spread of misinformation that could damage their image and reputation. During wartime and social challenges, such incidents can have serious consequences, underscoring the need for public figures to act responsibly and with sensitivity toward topics affecting citizens' lives and well-being. This also reinforces the necessity for societal unity and mutual understanding, especially during crises.