UA RU EN

The End of Nuclear Arms Control: What the Expiration of New START Means

Останнім часом світ стикається з новими викликами у сфері безпеки, пов’язаними з відсутністю ефективних механізмів контролю над ядерною зброєю.

New START's Expiration: A New Era of Uncertainty

The New START treaty between the United States and Russia will expire on February 5, 2024. Originally signed in 2010, this pact capped the number of deployed strategic nuclear warheads for each nation at 1,550. Its termination marks the end of over five decades of bilateral nuclear arms control agreements between the two superpowers. This development comes at a time of heightened geopolitical tension, making the absence of a formal framework particularly concerning.

Russia, which recently suspended on-site inspections under the treaty, has declared it no longer considers itself bound by the agreement's limits. The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated:

“Under the current circumstances, we proceed from the assumption that the parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons are no longer bound by any obligations or symmetrical declarations in the context of the treaty, including its central provisions, and are fundamentally free in choosing their next steps.”

— Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

While the United States has not expressed significant alarm over the treaty's lapse, Russia has voiced its own concerns. This divergence casts serious doubt on future efforts to manage nuclear arsenals, with potentially grave implications for global security. James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment, underscores the critical importance of this moment for international stability.

Consequences of the Treaty's End

The expiration of New START opens a new chapter in U.S.-Russian nuclear relations, as both nations are now free to determine their strategic nuclear postures without the constraints that were previously in place.

This new reality could lead to an escalation of nuclear tensions, as the absence of verifiable limits and inspection regimes creates significant risks for global security. Moving forward, it will be crucial to monitor how this impacts international diplomacy and the potential for negotiating new agreements to regulate nuclear weapons.