The wife of activist and head of the 'Center for Combating Corruption' Vitalii Shabunin, Olena, reacted to the spread of intimate photos of her husband online. In her post on Facebook, she emphasized that the addressee of these photos has always been and remains her, not half the country. Olena also explained that she and her husband, along with their children, left for abroad with the onset of the full-scale invasion but they tried to maintain intimacy by any available means, including explicit photographs and other communication methods.
Olena Shabunina mentioned that intimacy in a couple is necessary to be for both. Together with her husband, they develop and maintain intimate relationships using available communication methods. In particular, they exchange explicit photographs, conduct video calls, make voice recordings, flirt, and even consult a family psychologist. For the couple, keeping a relationship at a distance is not easy, but it is possible, so they use all available ideas and methods to preserve their closeness.
Quote from Olena Shabunina's post: 'Intimacy in a couple is what intimacy is for, to be for both.'
Activist and head of the 'Center for Combating Corruption' Vitalii Shabunin accused employees of the State Bureau of Investigation and the Office of the Prosecutor General of allegedly spreading his intimate photographs in Telegram channels. In response, the State Bureau of Investigation confirmed that it would thoroughly check all employees who had contact with the mentioned evidence.
Previously, Vitalii Shabunin also accused all those involved in the destruction of NABU and SAP employees on his website, which may be related to the spread of his personal photos. Investigations into this scandalous case and public reaction to the incident are currently ongoing.
The activist's wife noted that intimacy in a couple is important, but she and her husband do everything possible to maintain closeness even at a distance by using various communication methods. Investigations into the scandalous situation surrounding the spread of the activist's personal photos and public reaction to this incident are currently ongoing.