UA RU EN

Why Ukraine Cannot Seize Millions in Russian Banks Held by Corrupt Officials

Трудно отримати мільярди, заморожені в банках Росії через корупційні схеми. Photo: Главком

Ukrainian Corruption Probes Stymied by Funds in Russian Banks

On February 10, the head of Ukraine's Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), Oleksandr Klymenko, revealed that before Russia's full-scale invasion, suspects in Ukrainian corruption cases routinely used Russian banks to hold their illicit funds, placing them beyond the reach of Ukrainian justice. This practice highlights a significant vulnerability in international asset recovery efforts. Currently, no financial data is coming from Russia, and tracking these transfers requires joint investigative teams with other jurisdictions. However, Ukraine cannot send formal legal requests to Russia due to the complete lack of judicial cooperation between the warring states.

The finances of Ukrainian corrupt officials in Russia remain outside the control of Ukrainian law enforcement due to a lack of access to account data. Oleksandr Klymenko stated,

"We did not know the account numbers or the exact sums, so the money there remained outside our control."
To legally block and trace transfers from Russia to accounts in EU countries, the crime must be recognized as having been committed across several jurisdictions. This legal framework is essential for gathering admissible evidence.

Challenges in Combating Cross-Border Corruption

Klymenko illustrated the challenge with an example where an individual could receive one million euros in one country and then withdraw it in another. Such schemes allowed money to stay in Russia while the perpetrator could continue living in the EU. Corrupt Ukrainian officials would open temporary accounts in the EU and transfer money from Russia, effectively changing the funds' jurisdiction.

  • Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) is preparing an extradition request to Israel for suspects in the 'Midas' case, whose pre-trial investigation is ongoing.
  • As part of this proceeding, a significant sum of money posted as bail for one of the suspects has already been frozen.

Nevertheless, obtaining legally admissible evidence without cooperation from Russia through international legal channels remains a formidable obstacle.

The situation with corrupt assets in Russian banks underscores the severe challenges Ukraine faces in its anti-corruption fight. The absence of legal cooperation with Russia complicates access to information on accounts and financial transactions, making the asset recovery process far more protracted and difficult. This case points to the urgent need for developing robust international cooperation mechanisms to more effectively track and freeze assets linked to corruption crimes, especially across hostile borders.