UA RU EN

Operation 'Midas': why the figures in the corruption scheme at 'Energoatom' fled Ukraine

Операція 'Мідас': чому фігуранти корупційної схеми в 'Енергоатомі' залишили країну

Operation 'Midas': why the figures in the corruption scheme at 'Energoatom' fled Ukraine

On November 10, 2023, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) uncovered a massive corruption scheme associated with 'kickbacks' on tenders of the National Nuclear Energy Company 'Energoatom'. As part of this operation, known as 'Midas', the defendants in the case, including Timur Mindich, managed to leave Ukraine, raising serious questions about possible consequences, extradition, and connections to Russia.

Timur Mindich, who has close ties to President Volodymyr Zelensky, managed to leave the country amid an active investigation. In addition to him, the case involves:

  • former Minister of Energy Herman Halushchenko;
  • former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov;
  • Alexander Tsukerman, who left Ukraine a few weeks before the start of Operation 'Midas'.

All three suspects are citizens of Israel.

NABU is currently investigating the circumstances of the suspects' departure, as it raises questions about possible evasion of justice. Oleksandr Abakumov, head of the NABU detectives unit, noted that the scale of this story surprised them when they fully assembled it.

“We faced two different risks: on one hand – the risk of his departure; on the other hand – the risk of information leakage,” said Oleksandr Abakumov.

He also pointed out a general negative trend observed in Ukraine: “persons hiding from Ukrainian justice are trying to use the war as an argument in their favor.” The Mindich case continues to develop, and the question of extradition of the defendants remains open.

This situation highlights the serious challenges faced by the Ukrainian anti-corruption system, especially in times of war and instability. The escape of the figures in the 'Midas' case may indicate the existence of a support network for individuals trying to avoid punishment, which calls into question the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. Further developments in this case could affect public trust in anti-corruption institutions and their ability to ensure justice.