UA RU EN

Ukraine Peace Talks: The Donbas Territorial Dispute at the Heart of Negotiations

Переговори щодо миру в Україні: територіальні суперечки на Донбасі як основа обговорень Photo: ХВИЛЯ

Negotiations to End the War in Ukraine

Discussions to end the war in Ukraine are currently centered on the issue of territorial control in the eastern regions. The latest round of these talks concluded without any official signs of progress. A key point of contention is Russia's demand for Ukraine to cede control of a strip of land in the Donetsk region, measuring approximately 80 km in length and 64 km in width. This territory lies between the current front line and the region's administrative border. However, Ukraine has categorically refused any unilateral withdrawal of its forces. These negotiations highlight the immense challenge of reconciling sovereignty with security in a protracted conflict.

Proposals and Ideas Under Discussion

Various ideas are being debated, including a proposal to establish a demilitarized zone that would not be controlled by either army. This suggestion echoes a 28-point plan put forward by the Trump administration in November 2025. During a recent meeting in Abu Dhabi, the Ukrainian side also discussed options for a partial, and not necessarily symmetrical, withdrawal of Russian troops from the front line.

Furthermore, the possibility of creating a joint civilian administration to govern the disputed territories is under consideration. This administration could include representatives from both countries, but no agreement on its formation has been reached yet.

'Allowing an aggressor to take something is a major mistake' Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Amid these discussions, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has stressed the importance of signing security guarantees before any other documents. Meanwhile, William Taylor has emphasized that any resolution must be genuine and not coerced, as a forced agreement will not prove stable. The international community remains a key observer, concerned that any deal lacking legitimacy could unravel.

This phase of talks reflects the complex nature of the conflict, where territorial control and security are paramount. Despite the lack of progress, the discussion of potential compromises, such as demilitarized zones or joint administrations, indicates a willingness from both sides to engage in dialogue, albeit with significant disagreements. Statements from the Ukrainian president and international observers underscore that without proper security guarantees, any agreements may be fragile, complicating the search for a long-term solution to end the conflict.