UA RU EN

Thirteen Face Trial in Sumy Region Over Massive 2,500-Hectare State Land Grab

Обвинувачені постануть перед судом у Сумській області через масштабне спотворення державних земель площею 2,500 гектарів. Photo: САП

Massive State Land Seizure Case Heads to Court

Prosecutors have sent a major case of illegal state land seizure in the Sumy region to trial, charging 13 members of an alleged criminal group. The indictment accuses them of seizing approximately 2,500 hectares of land and attempting to take control of another 3,244 hectares. The scheme was reportedly operational between 2017 and 2021.

Investigators state the criminal actions resulted in the illegal takeover of 1,250 land plots totaling 2,499 hectares, valued at over 280 million Ukrainian hryvnias. The attempted seizure of the additional 3,244 hectares is estimated to be worth about 195 million hryvnias. The Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) worked jointly to secure the arrest of these land assets.

Charges and Public Reaction

The accused face charges under specific articles of the Ukrainian Criminal Code, including Part 5 of Article 191 (misappropriation of property through abuse of office) and Part 3 of Article 15 (attempted crime). The list of defendants includes high-profile figures such as:

  • A former Chairman of the Agrarian Committee of the Verkhovna Rada (Ukraine's parliament),
  • A former government Minister,
  • Senior officials from the State Geocadastre bodies,
  • Other individuals allegedly controlled by the scheme's organizers.

The case has generated significant public outcry due to the vast scale of the alleged crime and the involvement of high-ranking officials. This prosecution is part of a broader, ongoing effort to combat endemic corruption in Ukraine, particularly in its agricultural sector, which is a cornerstone of the national economy.

This case highlights serious systemic issues in Ukraine's land management, where corruption schemes can have severe consequences for state finances and society as a whole.

The importance of this trial extends beyond punishing the guilty; it represents a potential catalyst for reforming the land governance system to prevent similar crimes in the future. The public is closely following developments, hoping for justice and restored trust in state institutions.