Analyzing the 'Maritime Empire' Concept
In a discussion with political scientist Yuriy Romanenko, historian Illya Chedoluma analyzed the concept of a 'maritime empire,' using the United States as a case study and drawing parallels with ancient Athens, Carthage, the Venetian Republic, and the British Empire. Chedoluma argued that the U.S. belongs to this same category of state. The defining feature of such empires, he noted, is their prioritization of economic leverage over direct political control of territory.
This analysis was based on Thomas Barfield's book 'Shadow Empires.' The historian drew a direct parallel between the foreign policy of ancient Athens and that of modern Washington. According to him, when Athens encountered problems with other city-states, it imposed trade embargoes and raised customs tariffs—a primary tactic in its international relations. These economic factors, the expert contends, are the defining strategies of maritime empires.
Economic Opportunity and Societal Integration
Chedoluma also highlighted the selective nature of granting citizenship. He stated,
“if you have money and you generate money, you get U.S. citizenship... But if you come without capital, then the question is, what are you doing here, what have you come here for?”- Illya Chedoluma. This underscores that economic potential is a key factor for integration into American society.
The maritime empire strategy, according to the historian, makes America less vulnerable to land conflicts on other continents. U.S. security is guaranteed primarily by its naval power, allowing the nation to focus on economic influence. Chedoluma pointed out that
“whatever continental war... takes place on European soil, by and large, has no direct relation to the security of the United States of America”- Illya Chedoluma.
Thus, the concept of a maritime empire helps explain why the U.S. exerts global influence through economic means rather than occupation, relying on both historical precedents and contemporary practices. This framework is particularly relevant in an era where global supply chains and financial markets are primary arenas of international power.
Research into the maritime empire concept within the U.S. context emphasizes the importance of economic strategies in foreign policy. In an age of globalization and increasing international competition, understanding these historical parallels can aid in shaping new approaches to international relations. Chedoluma's analysis may prove useful for policymakers and analysts seeking to comprehend how economic interests shape America's foreign policy and its role in the world.