UA RU EN

Russian Court Cases Reveal the True Cost of Damaging Strategic Bombers

Судові справи в Росії показують, яку ціну доводиться платити за пошкодження стратегічних бомбардувальників.

Assessing the Financial Damage to Russian Military Hardware

Russian courts are currently hearing cases concerning damage to military equipment, including strategic bombers. These proceedings have revealed that the officially claimed losses from strikes on Russia's strategic aviation, under the 'Web' operation, amount to 2.3 billion rubles. An examination of military aircraft costs indicates that the price of a 'new' Tu-160M strategic bomber for the Russian Defense Ministry is 15-16 billion rubles, while repairing a single Tu-95MS bomber costs an average of 3.77 billion rubles. Modernizing a Tu-95MS runs to 5.3 billion rubles per aircraft.

A Specific Court Case Example

One illustrative case involves a 2019 crash that resulted in the loss of a Tu-22M3 bomber carrying an X-22 missile. In August 2023, a court handed suspended sentences to the former commander of the 40th Long-Range Aviation Regiment and his deputy. Initially, the financial service of the Russian Navy's Northern Fleet valued the lost property at 0 rubles, but during the trial, this figure was revised upward to 97 million rubles. The lost Tu-22M3 with its missile was ultimately valued at $1.3 million, and the former regiment commander was ordered to pay 4.5 million rubles.

These legal processes highlight the complexity and contentious nature of assessing damages related to strategic aviation losses in Russia. The staggering figures involved offer a rare glimpse into the immense financial value of these long-range weapons platforms.

Analysis suggests that the issue of valuing losses to strategic aviation is becoming increasingly pertinent amid ongoing military operations. The high costs for repair and modernization point to potential financial strains on the defense sector. Furthermore, these damage assessment trials could be significant for transparency and accountability in managing military assets, though their outcomes often appear inconsistent.