Trump's Secret Plan for Donbas: Renting to Russia and Demands from Ukraine
On November 19, 2025, it became known about the secret plan of the Trump administration to transfer control of Donbas to Russia for an indefinite fee, while Ukraine retains legal ownership of the territory. This plan was developed during secret negotiations between the USA and Russia that lasted three days in Miami. President Trump approved this deal, which caused outrage on the international stage.
Demands and Consequences of the Plan
The plan includes 28 points, among which are demands regarding:
- reducing the armed forces of Ukraine;
- recognizing the Russian language as the official state language;
- granting status to the Russian Orthodox Church in the occupied territories.
Moreover, the document states a ban on the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine and the cessation of military aid from the USA. As one of the negotiators stated, the plan focuses on providing security guarantees to both sides, which raised some hopes for reducing tensions in the region.
After the plan was made public, Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg announced his resignation, indicating internal disagreements within the American administration. Volodymyr Zelensky, the President of Ukraine, has repeatedly ruled out the possibility of surrendering Donbas to Russia, highlighting the complexity of the situation and the possible consequences for Ukrainian statehood. In a situation where the issue of Ukraine's territorial integrity remains on the agenda, news of secret agreements between major powers raises concern among the Ukrainian population and the international community.
Trump's plan raises significant concern, as it threatens Ukraine's sovereignty and could lead to further escalation of the conflict in the region. Internal disagreements in the USA, particularly General Kellogg's resignation, indicate that not everyone in the administration supports such approaches to resolving the conflict. The situation requires careful monitoring, as decisions made at the international level may have long-term implications for security in Eastern Europe.