UA RU EN

High Anti-Corruption Court Raises Bail by UAH 100 Million for Drone Case Suspect

Високий антикорупційний суд збільшив заставу на 100 мільйонів гривень для підозрюваного у справі про дрони. Photo: НАБУ

Preventive Measure Revised in Extortion Case

On May 5, 2026, the Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine (HACC) altered the preventive measure for an individual implicated in an extortion scheme involving a $1 million bribe for drone deliveries. The appellate court partially upheld the prosecutor’s appeal from the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), increasing the bail amount by nearly UAH 100 million.

The updated measure places the suspect in custody, with an alternative option to post bail exceeding UAH 142 million. This ruling marks a significant development in a case that has drawn widespread public attention due to the alleged extortion of a large sum in exchange for military drone supplies.

Significance of the Court’s Decision

Under Article 62, Part 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, an individual is presumed innocent until proven guilty through a lawful process and a binding court verdict.

This court decision is a crucial step in Ukraine’s anti-corruption efforts, as it compels the suspect to comply with the preventive measures and provides the public with a degree of oversight over their actions.

The case involving demands for a substantial bribe in connection with drone procurement highlights the ongoing need for robust anti-corruption measures, particularly in the context of the country’s military requirements. It underscores the importance of transparency and legal integrity in defense equipment supply contracts.

The recent ruling by the High Anti-Corruption Court is part of a broader pattern of judicial actions targeting corruption within Ukraine's military procurement processes. In a related case, the court has also ordered the detention of a border guard official and a drone manufacturer implicated in a separate extortion scheme involving a $1 million bribe. This highlights the ongoing efforts to combat corruption in defense contracts and emphasizes the critical need for accountability in such significant transactions. For more details on this case, you can read about the arrest of officials involved in a $1 million bribe.