UA RU EN

Texas Park Land Sold for $10 Million to Make Way for Data Center

Участок землі в Техасі, проданий за $10 мільйонів, перетвориться на центр обробки даних. Photo: НВ — Техно

Land Use Dispute Heats Up in Williamson County

A heated disagreement over land use has emerged in Williamson County, Texas, following the sale of a property originally donated for a public park. In 1999, the Bland family transferred nearly 36 hectares of land to the Texas Parks and Recreation Foundation for a nominal fee of just $10. Over the years, the property changed hands multiple times, and in 2025 it was sold to the company Blueprint for $10 million to build a data center.

Residents of Taylor have filed a lawsuit in an attempt to halt construction, arguing that the terms of the original donation agreement are being violated. Pamela Griffin, a local resident, voiced her frustration:

"He wanted to give this land for a park because kids need a place to play." – Pamela Griffin

However, the court has already dismissed the residents' initial lawsuit and refused to issue a temporary injunction to stop the work.

Zoning and the Property's History

According to Daniel Seguin, executive director of city services, the current zoning of the property permits such development without needing additional approval from the city. He confirmed that regardless of ownership changes, the original deed clearly outlined the land's intended use.

In 2003, the land was transferred to another nonprofit organization, and a month later, it was given to the city of Taylor. Then, in 2008, the city sold the plot to the Taylor Economic Development Corporation for $15,000. The sale to Blueprint is expected to generate roughly $30 million in tax revenue over the next decade.

The situation continues to stir concern among locals who want to preserve the land for community purposes.

This conflict over land use in Williamson County highlights the growing tension between commercial interests and community needs. Despite legal justifications, residents are fighting to protect what they see as a vital green space for children's recreation and neighborhood well-being. The outcome could set a precedent for similar disputes in other regions where public land faces pressure from private development projects.