Sibyha: Only a Ukraine-US-Russia Summit Can Speed Up War’s End, Not One Including China

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Speaks Out on Proposed Trilateral Meeting

According to МЗС: Andriy Sibyha, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, addressed the idea of a trilateral summit involving leaders from Russia, China, and the United States. He argued that such a meeting would likely hinder peace efforts, potentially encouraging Russian President Vladimir Putin to prolong the conflict. In contrast, Sibyha emphasized that direct talks between Ukraine, the US, and Russia could accelerate the war’s resolution.

Russia’s Shrinking Economy and War Toll

Sibyha highlighted alarming economic data about Russia, noting that its economy is at least 13 times smaller than that of the United States and 8 times smaller than China’s. He pointed out a rapid economic contraction accompanied by a declining standard of living for Russians. The war has inflicted severe human losses on Russia, with 1.6 million troops reportedly killed or wounded. Sanctions have contributed to a stagnation in Russian technology, industry, and business sectors.

The minister also warned that inviting Putin to such a summit would only fuel his delusions of grandeur.

“He is not a global leader but a war criminal. Russia is not a global power but a global problem,”

Sibyha stated. He insisted that Putin’s presence at the negotiation table would be justified only if accompanied by concrete peace initiatives, like agreeing to a ceasefire. Instead, Sibyha noted, the conflict continues to see escalating terror against civilians.

“As long as this terror persists, he should have no seat at any table,”

the minister added.

Sibyha’s remarks reflect Ukraine’s deep concerns about Russia’s international role amid ongoing hostilities. The highlighted economic difficulties and heavy casualties underline the immense challenges Russia faces. At the same time, Ukraine maintains a firm stance that any peace talks involving Putin must be tied to real steps toward ending the war, not merely legitimizing an aggressor on the world stage.

For international audiences, it’s important to recognize that Ukraine views direct engagement with Russia and the US-not broader multilateral talks including China-as the most viable path to ending the conflict swiftly.

In light of Sibyha's emphasis on direct negotiations, it's essential to explore other diplomatic efforts that could pave the way for peace. Recently, Andriy Sibyha discussed the EU Council meeting and its implications for sanctions and Ukraine's accession to the EU, highlighting the interconnectedness of these issues in the broader context of regional stability and conflict resolution.