Prosecutor Hanilov Received a Service Apartment in Kyiv: Questions About Legality

Service Apartment of Prosecutor Oleksandr Hanilov

According to Главком: Prosecutor Oleksandr Hanilov received a service apartment in Kyiv with an area of 110 sq. m. This happened in 2025, when by the end of November, eight employees of the Office of the Prosecutor General received service housing in the capital, including Hanilov. However, questions arise regarding the legality of this decision, as Hanilov's family resides in another city.

Hanilov is the father of five children, which adds context to the situation. In 2018, he worked under the supervision of Dmytro Basov, and in 2019, he failed the certification and was dismissed from the Prosecutor General's Office. Despite this, the prosecutor supported the public prosecution in the case of people's deputy Fedor Khrystenko. Prosecutor General Kravchenko confirmed the conclusion of the agreement on December 4, 2025, which occurred against the backdrop of other events, such as the release of Ruslan Magamedrasulov from custody on December 3, 2025.

Questions of Legality and Ethics

Prosecutor Hanilov received his apartment in the capital just before the Pechersk court approved the agreement with MP Khrystenko, as noted by Anastasia Radina. This circumstance raises additional questions and discussions regarding the legality and ethics of providing service housing to prosecutors, especially in the context of their professional and personal circumstances.

This situation underscores the relevance of the issue of transparency in the distribution of service housing for public servants, particularly prosecutors who have important duties within the justice system. Questions regarding the legality of providing apartments and the potential conflict of interest in Hanilov's case may become the subject of investigation or discussion at the level of society and government bodies. It is important that such decisions are supported by clear criteria and control mechanisms to avoid abuse and ensure trust in law enforcement agencies.