In the case against the prosecutor, a mechanism for income and expenses was opened, and the court concluded that a significant part of her assets was illegally acquired. The National Anti-Corruption Agency found that part of the money for the prosecutor’s apartment was gifted by her mother, but the verification of the woman's income and expenses showed that she could not legally accumulate such large sums.
Thus, the decision of the Appellate Chamber of VAKS confirmed the verdict of the first instance regarding the confiscation of UAH 1.64 million in assets that were deemed illegally acquired. This serves as another signal in the fight against corruption and illegal enrichment in power.