UA RU EN

Iranian Resistance Figure Ali Safavi: Armed Struggle is Now the Only Path to Overthrow the Regime

«Алі Сафаві, представник іранської опозиції, підкреслює, що лише збройна боротьба може привести до змін у владі в Ірані.»

Ali Safavi's Analysis of the Iranian Situation

In an interview for The Telegraph's 'Iran the latest' podcast, Ali Safavi, a member of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), argued that the regime in Tehran can no longer be removed through peaceful means, insisting that armed struggle has become necessary. He stated that the current conditions in the country demand radical action, as all avenues for peaceful political change have been systematically closed off by the authorities.

During the discussion, Safavi cited a stark threat from Iran's State Security Force Commander, Ahmad Radan:

“We will shoot anyone who takes to the streets.” - Ahmad Radan

This statement, according to Safavi, underscores the severe repression faced by any opposition. He further noted that during the January 2026 uprising, the resistance suffered significant casualties, losing approximately 2,000 people.

Outlook for the Democratic Struggle

To frame his argument, Safavi referenced a famous quote by John F. Kennedy:

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” - John F. Kennedy

He used this to justify his position on the need for a shift in tactics against the Iranian government. The political climate in Iran remains highly volatile, and Safavi's comments point to a deepening crisis. This perspective reflects a broader debate on the efficacy of non-violent protest under authoritarian regimes.

Safavi's remarks signal a profound loss of faith in the potential for peaceful protest within Iran, highlighting a dangerous escalation in political tensions. Given the regime's brutal crackdowns and the heavy losses sustained by the opposition, the question of how to achieve democratic change is becoming increasingly urgent. The international community is closely monitoring the situation, as further instability could have significant repercussions for regional security.

As the debate intensifies regarding the effectiveness of non-violent approaches in Iran, it's crucial to consider the insights of other opposition figures. One such leader has recently rejected the idea of engaging in dialogue with the regime, labeling it as a futile endeavor. This perspective aligns with Safavi's grim outlook, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of strategies in the fight for democratic change.