UA RU EN

Ukrainian Defendant in UK Arson Case Claims He Doesn't Know Who the British Prime Minister Is

Український обвинувачений у справі про підпал у Великій Британії стверджує, що не знає, хто керує країною.

Trial Over Arson Attacks on British Prime Minister's Property Underway

A London court is hearing the case involving a series of arson incidents targeting the property of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. During police questioning, 22-year-old Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych stated he was unaware of who leads the British government and had never heard of the current prime minister. He admitted knowing former UK leader Boris Johnson but claimed to have no interest in British politics. Lavrynovych told investigators he 'had never heard of the current British prime minister and does not follow British political affairs.'

Lavrynovych has pleaded not guilty, arguing that he agreed to carry out the tasks due to financial hardship and threats. Prosecutors allege the defendants acted on instructions and were paid by an individual using the alias 'El Money.' The arson spree at the center of the trial occurred in May 2025. Specifically:

  • On May 8, a Toyota vehicle previously owned by Starmer was set on fire;
  • On May 11, a fire broke out near the entrance of a home in Islington where Starmer had previously lived;
  • During the night of May 12, a house in the Kentish Town area linked to the prime minister was set ablaze.

The case is being handled by the police's counter-terrorism unit, which has arrested three Ukrainian citizens: Roman Lavrynovych, Petro Pochynok, and Stanislav Karpiuk. They are suspected of arson and conspiracy to endanger life. The trial is ongoing at the Old Bailey, where testimony and evidence continue to be presented.

Significance of the Trial

This trial has attracted significant attention both in the UK and internationally due to its connection to attacks on the property of a high-ranking official. Given the implications for international relations and Ukraine's reputation, the outcome could influence how Ukrainian citizens are perceived in Britain. The case also highlights growing concerns over security and terrorism in the context of modern political challenges.