Backlash Against Procurement Reforms Led to His Removal, Fedorov Says

Mykhailo Fedorov's Ouster

According to 5 канал: Former Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov revealed in an interview with Ukrainska Pravda, published on July 29, 2026, that his dismissal stemmed from opposition to procurement and tender reforms. The changes he attempted to introduce at the Ministry of Defense provoked significant dissatisfaction among groups with financial stakes in the system, he said. Fedorov noted that he had detected escalating pressure on the ministry starting in early April, and by then he understood the situation could lead to severe repercussions. The case underscores the ongoing battle between reformers and vested interests in Ukraine's defense sector.

"I warned the president: look, people will come to you and say something's wrong with me... You have to cross-check that information with me, because I stepped on the interests of many people and companies. Your support is crucial."

Mykhailo Fedorov

Fedorov also alerted the president to a possible smear campaign. He provided an example: 'Imagine, right now 59 companies have entered the mid-strike. The budget will see savings of 20–30% thanks to holding a tender.' When asked by a journalist whether he had been dismissed, Fedorov confirmed his removal, replying, 'So it seems that way.' Activist Serhiy Sternenko interpreted the events, asserting that the true reason for Fedorov's resignation was the dismantling of corrupt schemes and financial flows:

"I think this is the real reason for Fedorov's resignation. He eliminated too many large flows and schemes. Many of those who benefited from those flows started working to get him removed. And they succeeded."

Serhiy Sternenko

Public Response

In the wake of these events, protest actions have been unfolding across Ukrainian cities in response to Fedorov's dismissal. He himself has stated he is not interested in any other government role, only a return to the Ministry of Defense. The controversy surrounding his resignation has ignited a wide societal debate, given its connection to essential reforms in the nation's defense sector.

Fedorov's removal highlights the existing friction within Ukraine's defense procurement system, where business and state interests frequently clash. The public reaction, especially the protests, reflects concern that old schemes and corrupt practices might be revived in this domain. The ongoing discussion also suggests a continued need for reforms and greater transparency in government procurement.

The ongoing turmoil surrounding Fedorov's dismissal highlights a broader issue within Ukraine's defense reforms. This situation is reminiscent of previous challenges faced by the ministry, such as the communication failures that hindered mobilization reform. Understanding these past events can provide valuable insights into the current dynamics and the resistance faced by reformers like Fedorov.