Artificial Intelligence Could Usher in 'Post-Fascism' by Offering a Digital Alibi

A Critical Philosophical Look at the Use of Artificial Intelligence

According to ХВИЛЯ: In a piece published on Substack, author Barch delivers a philosophical critique of artificial intelligence, using the Palantir project as a central case study. The author argues that AI functions not just as a technological tool but as an instrument of power, one that substitutes calculation for meaning. Barch’s core claim is that decisions made through AI are not truly objective, because they are built on hidden assumptions. This creates what he calls a 'digital alibi'-a way for decision-makers to dodge accountability. According to the author, this dynamic could give rise to a condition he terms 'Post-Fascism.'

The Evolution of Thought and the Role of Morality

Barch traces the evolution of human thought, noting that shamans and rituals came first, followed by religions, and later by ideologies. Today, he argues, artificial intelligence has emerged as the latest imitation of these systems. Underneath this technology, he claims, there is no true foundation-only 'an animal instinct for dominance wrapped in code.' He stresses that only morality can establish a boundary of what is acceptable, a line that cannot be computed.

Regarding the Palantir project, Barch describes it as a clear example of how AI can be wielded as a tool of power, where 'efficiency matters more than consensus.' He sums up Palantir’s underlying logic with the following quote:

“It’s not us. It’s the data. It’s the model. It’s the artificial intelligence.”

In his view, what is happening today is not merely a technological breakthrough; it is an expression of post-fascist tendencies, where the source of power becomes invisible.

For Barch, the task of philosophy is not just to describe the world, but to return to fundamental questions about ethics and moral values. This analysis underscores the need for critical thinking about technology’s impact on society and our capacity to make informed decisions in the digital age.

Barch’s critique draws attention to the core issues surrounding the use of artificial intelligence today, warning of potential negative consequences that could arise from thoughtless technological adoption. It highlights the urgent need for an ethical approach to AI development and deployment-one that can prevent potential abuses and uphold democratic values. As technology increasingly shapes decision-making, it is essential for society to actively debate the moral and ethical dimensions of its use.

As the debate surrounding the implications of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, it is crucial to consider the warnings from notable figures in the field. For instance, a Nobel laureate has cautioned about the potential loss of control over AI, emphasizing the need for a careful examination of how these technologies shape societal structures and governance. This complements Barch's argument about the moral responsibilities intertwined with AI decision-making.