Proceedings at the Constitutional Court of Ukraine
On July 9, 2026, the Grand Chamber of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (CCU) issued eight rulings, extended the review of cases based on constitutional complaints, and prolonged the deadline for issuing decisions until July 30, 2026. The Second Senate of the CCU continued its examination of cases arising from constitutional complaints submitted by:
- Hryhorii S. Syvukhin
- Taras V. Andreichuk
- Larysa V. Holnyk
- Oksana V. Bukhtoiarova
The Second Panel of Judges declined to initiate proceedings on complaints from:
- Serhii Ye. Vashchenko
- Serhii V. Kleshchar
Meanwhile, the Third Panel of Judges opened proceedings on a complaint filed by Ilona V. Zakharova.
Among the decisions made on July 9, the Grand Chamber of the CCU issued a ruling to hear a case based on a constitutional submission from the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions in Article 30 of the Law of Ukraine "On the State Budget of Ukraine for 2026." Another ruling was issued to review a case concerning a constitutional submission from the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 1778, dated December 30, 2025, which outlines the procedure for pension payments to specific categories of individuals during 2026 under martial law. Both cases have been scheduled for review in written proceedings.
Extended Deadlines and New Rulings
The Grand Chamber of the CCU also extended the deadline for panels of judges to issue rulings on whether to open or refuse constitutional proceedings in cases based on complaints from:
- K. I. Biloboroda
- S. Ye. Vashchenko
- D. O. Zhadan
- S. V. Kleshchar
The Second Senate continued its review of constitutional complaints from H. S. Syvukhin, T. V. Andreichuk, L. V. Holnyk, and O. V. Bukhtoiarova, which address various aspects of Ukrainian legislation.
The Second Panel of Judges of the Second Senate issued final rulings refusing to open constitutional proceedings in cases based on complaints from S. Ye. Vashchenko and S. V. Kleshchar. Vashchenko's complaint challenged the constitutionality of Part Two of Article 328 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, while Kleshchar's complaint targeted Article 39 of the Law of Ukraine "On the State Budget of Ukraine for 2024."
Additionally, the panel of judges will continue to consider whether to open constitutional proceedings based on a complaint from Viktor I. Maslianitsyn. The Third Panel of Judges of the Second Senate opened constitutional proceedings in a case concerning a complaint from I. V. Zakharova, which questions the constitutionality of paragraph two of Item 12 in the "Final Provisions" section of the Law of Ukraine "On the State Budget of Ukraine for 2024."
Thus, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is actively advancing its review of crucial constitutional cases, which could significantly shape the country's legal framework.
Issues related to the state budget and pension provisions are particularly pressing under martial law, underscoring the importance of the court's work during this challenging period. The CCU's rulings could have a substantial impact on Ukraine's financial stability and the social protection of its citizens.
In light of the recent decisions made by the Grand Chamber of the CCU, it is essential to understand the broader context of the court's activities. Just a few weeks prior, on June 24, the Constitutional Court issued two significant decisions along with eight rulings, reflecting its ongoing efforts to address pressing legal matters. For a detailed overview of those developments, you can read more about the recent rulings and their implications.