On June 24, the Constitutional Court Issued 2 Decisions and 8 Rulings

Court Activity Summary for June 24

According to Конституційний суд: On June 24, the court delivered two decisions and issued eight rulings. The First Senate reviewed constitutional complaints submitted by Viktor Mykolayovych Savchenko and Ivan Andriyovych Minchenko. Both appeals challenge the constitutionality of Article 13, Part 5 of Ukraine's Law 'On the Status of War Veterans and Guarantees of Their Social Protection.'

The Second Senate issued rulings on cases involving constitutional complaints from Serhiy Oleksiyovych Hnezdilov and Viktor Valeriyovych Prykhodko. Hnezdilov’s complaint targets the constitutionality of Article 176, Part 8 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, while Prykhodko’s appeal addresses the constitutionality of paragraph 1 of Point 13-1 in Section XV of the Law 'On Compulsory State Pension Insurance' and paragraph 70 of Subpoint 27, Point 19, Section I of the Law 'On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Regarding Pension Increases.'

The Second Senate also continued reviewing cases based on constitutional complaints from:

• Roman Volodymyrovych Dudin,
• Volodymyr Mykhaylovych Lopushanskyi,
• Yuriy Ivanovych Tsvirkun,
• Larysa Vladlenivna Holnyk,
• Oksana Vasylivna Bukhtoyarova.

Dudin and Lopushanskyi’s complaints question the constitutionality of various legal provisions, including Article 182, Part 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code and articles governing court fees. Tsvirkun’s complaint involves the constitutionality of points in the Law 'On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,' while Holnyk challenges parts of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Bukhtoyarova raises issues related to anti-corruption legislation.

The Second Senate consolidated into a single proceeding the cases of 'Promgas City' LLC, 'Lvivenergozbut' LLC, and 'UKR GAZ RESURS' LLC. The combined case examines the constitutionality of Point 2, Part 5 of Article 41 of the Law 'On Public Procurement.' Judge-rapporteurs for this case were V. V. Horodovenko and H. V. Yurovska. The Second Senate issued a ruling to proceed with the consolidated case through written proceedings.

The Second Panel of Judges of the First Senate issued a final ruling refusing to open proceedings on the complaint of Olena Volodymyrivna Bikla. Bikla’s complaint challenges the constitutionality of Parts 4 and 7 of Article 376 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. The Third Panel of Judges of the First Senate also issued final rulings refusing to open proceedings on complaints from Markiyan Volodymyrovych Hrynovets, Viktor Ivanovych Maslyanitsyn, and 'Promgas City' LLC.

Additionally, a panel of judges issued a non-unanimous ruling refusing to open proceedings on the complaint of Viktoriya Viktorivna Shalukhina, which was referred to the First Senate. The Second Panel of Judges of the Second Senate opened constitutional proceedings on the complaint of Yuriy Mykolayovych Vorobyov, which concerns the constitutionality of specific provisions of the Law 'On Compensation for Damage and Destruction of Certain Categories of Real Estate Due to Hostilities.'

Consideration of the issue regarding the opening of proceedings on the complaint of Roman Stepanovych Koliievskyi was postponed. Overall, the court’s work on June 24 covered a significant number of important cases addressing the constitutionality of various aspects of Ukrainian legislation.

These outcomes highlight the active role of Ukraine’s judicial system in handling constitutional complaints related to citizens’ rights and freedoms. Notably, cases involving social guarantees for veterans and pension provisions are particularly relevant amid the country’s ongoing socio-economic challenges. The court’s attention to anti-corruption measures and judicial efficiency further underscores its function in upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice in society.