UA RU EN

Jehovah's Witness Sentenced to 5 Years for Evading Military Service in Ukraine

Свідка Єгови покарано п'ятьма роками в'язниці за ухилення від служби в армії України.

Verdict from the Stryi City District Court

A court in Ukraine's Lviv region has sentenced a 47-year-old Jehovah's Witness to five years in prison for abandoning his assigned military service post. The man, an active member of his religious community for over 23 years, was assigned to work as a cook at a District Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center (TRC) in February 2025. He left his post after one week, citing his religious beliefs as the reason for his refusal to serve.

His assigned duties as a cook included:

  • Preparing food;
  • Maintaining kitchen cleanliness;
  • Unloading supplies;
  • Clearing tables.

In June 2025, the man voluntarily reported to the State Bureau of Investigations (SBI) but refused to take a military oath or wear a uniform. The court ruled that under Ukraine's current martial law, the legal framework does not provide for alternative civilian service to replace mandatory military duty, which formed the basis for the prison sentence. This case highlights the tension between conscription laws and religious freedom during wartime.

Trial Proceedings and Implications

During the trial, the court considered a negative performance report from the TRC and referenced Supreme Court practice, which distinguishes between peacetime conscription and mandatory service during mobilization. The court determined that his mobilization for service was legally obligatory and that his refusal to perform his duties constituted a criminal violation. Consequently, he was found guilty and sentenced to five years' imprisonment.

This verdict underscores the complex legal landscape surrounding military service in Ukraine, where national defense duties take precedence under martial law. It is likely to fuel ongoing debates about the rights of religious minorities and their ability to adhere to conscientious beliefs while the country is in a state of war. The outcome may influence both public opinion and future policy discussions regarding alternative service and human rights protections.