Kyiv's Solomianskyi Court Orders Two-Month Detention for Valentyna Moloda in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka Unrest Case

Developments at the Solomianskyi District Court

According to Рубрика — Суспільство: On November 4, the Solomianskyi District Court in Kyiv ruled that Valentyna Moloda must remain in custody for two months without the option of bail, linked to the disturbances in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka. On the same day, the court also imposed a two-month detention on Tetiana Kiriieva, who is another suspect in the case. Valentyna Moloda was formally charged on November 3 with obstructing the lawful operations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, sharing information about military locations, and orchestrating mass unrest.

According to case documents, Moloda allegedly offered emergency evacuation services using an ambulance for 107,000 hryvnias. Evidence shows that by October 30 at the latest, Kiriieva conspired with Moloda to disrupt the activities of a military unit. Kiriieva created a Telegram group where she shared details about the military’s whereabouts.

Events in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka

On November 2, Valentyna Moloda and Viktor Yena arrived at a house in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka. Moloda, posing as an ambulance worker, recorded video footage and reported the presence of military personnel in the residence. Viktor Yena also filmed the scene and served as the driver. That same day, local residents gathered near the private home where National Guard soldiers were stationed. Social media circulated claims alleging approximately 40 individuals were being unlawfully detained in the building's basement.

National Guard Commander Oleksandr Pivnenko confirmed that soldiers were indeed inside the building; they had been returned to their units after unauthorized absence. Four soldiers were taken to hospital, while Military Ombudswoman Olga Reshetylova and National Guard leadership were present at the site. All personnel remain safe, and medical care is provided to those in need.

The contested property serves as a temporary base for a military unit associated with the Azov Corps. Following the clashes, Kirill Budanov, Head of the Presidential Office, announced plans to coordinate a response alongside security agencies. An official inquiry and internal investigation will be conducted to clarify the circumstances.

The prosecution presents evidence of a conspiracy between Kiriieva and Moloda aimed at hindering the lawful functioning of the military unit, alongside provocations intended to escalate the conflict.

I run a private clinic that provides emergency medical services, which is registered under my name. I am the chief physician there. I am capable of fulfilling any responsibilities related to saving lives and protecting people's health.

Valentyna Moloda

Moloda also stated she was unaware of the building’s military status until a general arrived on-site. This incident has sparked significant attention from government authorities, underscoring its importance for public safety and national security.

This case highlights the challenges of maintaining security and law enforcement during ongoing military operations in Ukraine. The swift actions of state bodies demonstrate the critical need to uphold legal order and support the Armed Forces. The forthcoming investigations will be crucial for preventing similar conflicts in the future.

The implications of the court's decision extend beyond the immediate case of Valentyna Moloda. As the legal proceedings unfold, it is crucial to understand the broader context of her actions and the accusations against her. For more insights into the charges related to obstructing military operations and the ongoing judicial considerations, see our detailed coverage regarding the detention of Valentyna Moloda.