A Broken Laundry Room Made a Warship Flee: Psychologist Blames U.S. Military Weakness on Lack of Ideology

Why the U.S. Army Isn't Ready for Major Wars

According to ХВИЛЯ: Political psychologist Vsevolod Zelenin and political scientist Yuriy Romanenko have shared their views on why the U.S. military is unprepared for large-scale ground conflicts with heavy casualties. They point to two main issues: a lack of ideological motivation and a deep fear of losses. Romanenko flatly ruled out any possibility of a full-scale U.S. invasion in the Middle East, arguing that such a move would be disastrous for Donald Trump’s administration.

The Current State of America’s Armed Forces

Zelenin describes the modern U.S. military mindset as “post-heroic thinking,” which he says leads to psychological fragility. In his view, minor everyday problems can demoralize troops faster than actual combat threats. He gave the example of a warship retreating from battle simply because its laundry facility was destroyed by bombing.

‘The American army is in a condition where it is not ready to accept losses-say, tens of thousands of people,’ Vsevolod Zelenin stated.

He emphasized that while the military may be technically advanced, its psychological readiness for significant casualties falls short. Zelenin also pointed to a shift in societal values, where lofty ideology has been replaced by cold pragmatism. In the past, he noted, the struggle was between two systems-the American idea and way of life. Now, arguments like Trump’s ‘for the oil’ are not enough to motivate U.S. service members.

‘I cannot imagine these soldiers dying in large numbers on the battlefield in Iran. What for?’ the psychologist stressed.

Zelenin added that American society is not prepared to accept losses of one to two thousand people per day during combat in mountainous terrain. He highlighted the negative experience of U.S. ground operations in Afghanistan, where troops faced serious difficulties, as well as the situation in Iraq, where-despite a relatively quick victory-the U.S. was ultimately forced to leave. This history shapes the public’s current reaction to potential military casualties.

The experts’ comments reflect growing concern about U.S. readiness for new military conflicts, especially given the lessons of past operations. Public opinion and the ideological foundations that once supported military action are shifting, which could significantly affect political decisions about future wars. In the face of global threats, it is important to consider not only the technical side of military preparedness but also the psychological state of both the troops and society at large.

As the U.S. military grapples with its current challenges, the global landscape is shifting, with nations like Ukraine emerging as pivotal players. This transformation highlights the need for a reevaluation of military strategies and ideologies. To understand how Ukraine has positioned itself as a significant force in the world, explore how it has become an independent power center in the face of adversity.