Scandalous Deletion: Material on the Benefits of Defeats for Russia Disappears from MK

Disappearance of the Publication in Moskovsky Komsomolets

According to Главком: An article has mysteriously vanished from the website of the Russian publication Moskovsky Komsomolets, which argued that geopolitical failures can be more beneficial than triumphs. This text sparked heated discussions online: its author listed historical precedents allegedly supporting this idea, including the Mongol yoke, the Stolbovsky Peace with Sweden, and the Crimean War. The publication was removed without any explanation, and the editorial team gathered and analyzed the key points of that material.

The article claimed that throughout Russia's history, "major geopolitical failures were sometimes more advantageous than brilliant victories." It noted that "any military fiasco, any 'disgraceful peace' did not destroy Rus and Russia, but, on the contrary, tempered them, which later led to the expansion of borders and strengthened positions." Additionally, it presented the idea that "the yoke was slavery, but under these conditions, Rus strengthened so much that it was able to liberate itself from it."

Reforms and Public Response

Particular attention was paid to the figure of Peter I: the author argued that "in Russia, each military defeat or humiliating peace led to transformations - the weakening of elites and the expansion of freedoms for the people." It emphasized that "the outcome was always the same: a defeated country swiftly increased its might." After the article's release, many users on social media took notice of it, indicating its resonance in public discourse.

The long-standing editor-in-chief of Moskovsky Komsomolets is Pavel Gusev, who also heads the public council under the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. The disappearance of the material raised new questions about the motives for its removal and possible consequences for the media environment in Russia.

The removal of the article may indicate the sensitivity of the topic of geopolitical defeats and their impact on national identity in the Russian Federation. The ideas presented in the text can provoke debates in light of current foreign policy challenges and domestic political situations, demonstrating the authorities' desire to control discussions about history and its interpretations. Furthermore, this may reflect the increasing pressure on media in Russia when covering historical events, leading to self-censorship and restrictions on freedom of speech.