Shooting clubs should take over civilian firearm training, says National Police deputy chief

Ukraine moves toward legislative framework for civilian gun ownership

According to Главком: Ukraine is advancing preparations for a legal foundation governing civilian firearm possession. Oleksandr Fatsevych, deputy head of the National Police, has proposed that licensed shooting clubs handle the training of prospective gun owners. He also stressed the need to replace current Ministry of Internal Affairs regulations with formal legislative provisions. Fatsevych noted that Ukraine’s existing gun ownership rules are based on subordinate legal acts, a system he says requires comprehensive reform.

According to Fatsevych, neither the Ministry of Internal Affairs nor the National Police should be responsible for training citizens in firearm use.

“I believe this task should be delegated to licensed sports shooting clubs that have the proper permits, certifications, and qualified instructors,” – Oleksandr Fatsevych.

He added that clubs taking on this role would also contribute tax revenue. The most contentious issue remains short-barreled rifled weapons, particularly handguns. Currently, civilians may only obtain permits to store such firearms at home, and only if they belong to specific eligible categories.

Fatsevych also pointed out that the rules governing the use of firearms in self-defense situations are still defined by internal directives rather than law.

“When we talk about weapons for the public, we mean civilian firearms. The most urgent step now is to pass a law on this matter,” – Oleksandr Fatsevych.

Meanwhile, Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Office of the President, has voiced opposition to broad civilian gun legalization. In his view, “gun legalization has never worked and will not work now.”

Debate heats up over legalizing firearms for self-defense

Budanov addressed the issue of carrying weapons for self-defense, arguing that the matter requires extensive public debate and careful study of international practices. He also warned that distributing firearms would not guarantee real protection and could instead lead to a significant rise in violent incidents. The ongoing discussion around gun legalization in Ukraine remains highly relevant, sparking intense debate among both officials and the broader public.

The conversation over civilian firearm legalization in Ukraine reflects growing societal interest in personal security. Divergent positions held by senior officials-such as the National Police deputy chief and the head of the President’s Office-highlight the lack of consensus on the issue. The push for legislative clarity and proper training underscores the need to balance individual rights with public safety concerns. These factors are likely to shape the future trajectory of firearm policy in the country.

As the debate on civilian firearm ownership intensifies, contrasting views among Ukrainian officials emerge. While Oleksandr Fatsevych advocates for structured training through licensed shooting clubs, Kyrylo Budanov raises concerns about the implications of broader gun legalization, suggesting that such measures may not yield the desired outcomes for public safety.