Could the Current Oil Shock Surpass the Crises of the 1970s?
The Current Energy Crisis
According to Главком: The ongoing energy crisis, triggered by the war in Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, is drawing comparisons to the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979. Analysts are assessing the potential economic fallout as supply tightens, prices surge, and critical energy infrastructure sustains damage. This situation highlights the persistent vulnerability of global energy markets to geopolitical instability in key producing regions.
The oil crises of the 1970s saw prices quadruple in 1973-74 and triple in 1979, with global supply shrinking by about 5%. The current crisis, stemming from the Iran war, involves a more severe supply contraction of roughly 8%. It's crucial to note the vastly different scale of the market: global oil supply was under 60 million barrels per day in 1973, compared to nearly 94 million barrels per day in 2022.
Back then, OPEC nations supplied over half the world's crude oil; their share now stands at just over 36%. Data shows the United States has provided nearly all (90%) of the incremental oil supply to the global market over the last decade. At the start of 2024, the International Energy Agency's (IEA) oil reserves reached 8.2 billion barrels, their highest level since February 2021. A portion of these reserves has been used to reduce the oil shortfall from the Middle East from 11 million to 8 million barrels per day.
Impact on the Energy Market
More than 40 energy facilities across nine Middle Eastern countries have suffered serious damage. Qatar, which supplies about 20% of the world's gas, has warned of a potential 17% reduction in gas supply over the next three to five years. OECD stockpiles could offset a halt in oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz for about nine months, while China holds reserves sufficient to cover roughly seven months of its Middle Eastern crude imports.
Fatih Birol notes that 'we are facing 'the biggest threat to energy security in human history''.
Damaged or inoperative energy infrastructure further complicates the crisis. Emergency measures taken to address it may yield results, but the outcome heavily depends on the duration of the war against Iran. As Carsten Fritsch observes, 'if you draw on OECD stocks, both commercial and strategic, they could compensate for a halt in oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz for about nine months.'
The energy market remains under severe strain due to the reduced global supply of oil and gas, causing significant concern among importing nations. The experience of past oil crises points to potential economic consequences, including inflation and higher energy costs, which could impact the global economy at large. The length of the Iran conflict and the response of international markets will be the key factors determining how this situation evolves.
The escalating tensions in the Middle East have not only impacted oil supply but have also led to significant price increases. For instance, the recent closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused Brent crude prices to soar past $100, resulting in a historic shortage. This situation mirrors the current energy crisis and emphasizes the fragility of global energy markets. To explore how these developments are interlinked, read more about the implications of the Strait's closure here.
Read also

