Expert Exposes Critical Flaws in Housing Reform Bill Lacking Safety Nets

Analysis of the New Housing Reform Legislation

According to ХВИЛЯ: Oleg Popenko, an expert in housing and communal services, has analyzed a new housing reform bill that is drawing significant criticism for its lack of a transition period and necessary safety mechanisms. During a broadcast on his YouTube channel 'Oleg Popenko PRO', he stressed that the bill mandates the automatic creation of 'simple associations' in every building within a year, a move he believes could have negative consequences for residents.

Popenko emphasized the absence of a transitional phase, stating, 'We are not being offered a transition period. We are being told: within a year we create a simple association in every building, and you're on your own. This is a serious mistake.' He pointed out that many residents may lack the ability or desire to form a formal homeowners' association (OSBB), which could lead to significant building management problems.

Key Risks of the Reform

The expert identifies a major omission in the reform: the lack of a 'supplier of last resort' institution for building management services. This mechanism, common in gas and electricity markets, is known as a guaranteed service provider (GSP), which could be appointed by local authorities or through a court. Popenko noted that:

'you switch to a GSP, which is appointed for you either by local authorities or through a court... You might receive fewer services for a higher price... But you have the understanding that you have not been abandoned.' - Oleg Popenko

The expert argues that without proper protective mechanisms, the situation could become difficult for residents unable to actively participate in forming an OSBB. 'This is the first and crucial mistake-the absence of a supplier of last resort. We are simply tearing apart what was built over 10 years and saying: Well, figure it out yourselves,' summarized Oleg Popenko.

Oleg Popenko's analysis of the new housing reform bill highlights potential risks for residents stemming from insufficient protective measures. In a country where many buildings are still managed by older systems, the push for rapid, mandatory association formation is contentious. When not all residents are prepared or able to create an OSBB, it is vital to consider the possible negative impacts on housing management. The absence of a supplier of last resort could lead to difficulties in securing essential services, which in turn may affect residents' quality of life. Public discussion of these issues will continue, as the reform directly impacts the daily lives of many Ukrainians.