Florida Sues OpenAI, Alleging Deception and Harm to Users

Florida Files Civil Lawsuit Against OpenAI

According to НВ — Техно: On June 2, 2026, at 10:30 AM, the state of Florida initiated a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, accusing them of fraudulent practices and exploiting users-particularly Florida residents. The complaint seeks financial penalties and court orders to halt certain activities. State Attorney General James Uthmeier stated that the action aims to hold Altman personally accountable for what the state claims is damage inflicted on Floridians by his company.

Allegations Against OpenAI

The lawsuit details four instances of unfair and deceptive trade practices, along with two counts of negligence. It also criticizes the company for two violations of product liability laws. A key element of the case involves allegations of fraud and creating a public threat. The document references several incidents of mass violence, including:

• a shooting at Florida State University last year that left two dead and at least six wounded;
• the deaths of two University of South Florida students earlier this year;
• a mass shooting in February in British Columbia, Canada, which killed eight people, including children.

OpenAI is currently facing at least eight lawsuits connected to mass violence or self-harm. As stated in the filing, “OpenAI’s growth was made possible through deception and exploitation of users, particularly Florida residents.”

James Uthmeier, who launched a criminal investigation into OpenAI several months ago, noted that the case continues to evolve. This lawsuit underscores the seriousness of the allegations confronting the company and their societal impact.

This legal action represents a significant step in regulating technology companies that are increasingly woven into everyday life. Florida authorities are seeking to highlight the potential consequences of artificial intelligence usage, emphasizing the need for accountability in the development and deployment of new technologies. The outcome of this case could profoundly influence tech legislation and set a precedent for future lawsuits against similar firms.