Expert Decries Financial Gridlock in Ukraine's Utilities: Why Fees Fail to Fund Network Upgrades
The Funding Crisis in Public Utility Infrastructure
According to ХВИЛЯ: In a March 26, 2026, broadcast on his YouTube channel 'Oleg Popenko PRO,' expert Oleg Popenko voiced serious concerns over the utility funding strategy adopted after 2015. He argued that this approach has resulted in a financial paralysis for the sector, blocking essential network modernization. Popenko identified a core flaw: the entire cost of services is being placed on household utility bills. This funding model is common in many post-Soviet states, where aging infrastructure poses a constant challenge.
The strategic shift in supporting the housing and communal services sector occurred after 2015. Under pressure from the International Monetary Fund to minimize central budget subsidies, the financial burden for maintaining water utilities was transferred to local authorities and user tariffs.
'The established position is that all costs must be covered exclusively by the tariffs set for the population. In other words, you and I are supposed to pay for all capital repairs out of our own pockets. But this is absurd and utter nonsense.'
Oleg Popenko
Popenko noted that for a decade, systematic modernization of water utilities has been neglected. 'A model has emerged where one side doesn't want to act-I mean the local level-and the state budget doesn't want to either. So for ten years, no one modernized the water systems; they just patched things up here and there, and this has now erupted into a systemic crisis,' he added.
The expert also pointed to a disconnect among decision-makers, stating, 'They are largely indifferent because they live in private homes and cottages. They don't use the municipal water supply; they have their own wells drilled. They are doing just fine.'
The Urgent Need for a Solution
Oleg Popenko stressed that the situation in the housing and communal services sector requires an urgent resolution. The continued lack of investment in modernizing water infrastructure is likely to lead to significant future problems.
Popenko's remarks highlight deep-seated systemic issues in managing public infrastructure, which risk intensifying without proper funding and upgrades. The importance of this matter is growing amid rising demands for water quality and environmental standards, as it impacts not only public comfort but also the nation's overall infrastructural health.
As the financial strain on utility companies continues to escalate, the implications of their mounting debt-currently at UAH 120 billion-raise serious questions about the feasibility of increasing tariffs. This situation is further compounded by the concerns highlighted by Oleg Popenko regarding the funding model for public utilities. To understand the broader context of this crisis and its potential solutions, explore our detailed analysis on the unsustainable debt faced by utility providers.
Read also

